Ara Macao Resort & Marina News from
Placencia Belize
UPDATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
27 June 2007: A phone call
was received today from an independent contractor employed by Ara Macao
asking (demanding?) that the historical information on this Website about
Ara Macao be taken down because it is "misleading and inflammatory."
I have reviewed the information presented here, and all of it reports
events as they occurred during the Ara Macao EIA approval process.
This entire process was a very significant one for the Placencia Peninsula
and surrounding areas. It occupied public debate for over an entire
year, it brought Peninsula communities and people together, and ultimately
has made everyone on the Peninsula much more aware of environmental and
development issues. It also raised issues that continue to need to
be answered, such as the capacity and recharge rate of the aquifer that
provides water to the people of the Peninsula. For these reasons
alone, the information provided here is important for the Peninsula,
historically, environmentally, sociologically and economically.
1 June 2007: Justice Awich
of the Belize Supreme Court denied PCSD's application to proceed with
judicial review of the approval of Ara Macao by the Belize Department of
the Environment. Justice Awich also assessed legal costs against
PCSD. PCSD did not have the funds to appeal Justice Awich's ruling,
although PCSD does believe that Justice Awich's ruling was in error.
A copy of the judicial decision will be made available when a
digital copy can be obtained.
2 April 2007: On Monday, 2
April 2007, the Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development (PCSD)
filed a lawsuit asking the Belize Supreme Court to overturn the decision
of the Belize Department of the Environment (DOE) approving the Ara Macao
Resort and Marina development at the northern end of the Placencia
Peninsula. PCSD also asked the court to grant an injunction to prevent Ara
Macao Development Ltd. from proceeding with the development.
PCSD’s suit is based, in part, on DOE’s failure to comply with Belize’s
environmental regulations.
PCSD also maintains that DOE unreasonably and irrationally approved the
development because it did not have critical information about
environmental issues such as downstream beach erosion, effect of the
development on the Peninsula’s marine environment (such as lobster, conch
and coral reefs), and whether Ara Macao and other new developments could
quickly use up the water supply that provides Placencia, Seine Bight, Maya
Beach, Independence and Big Creek with drinking water.
PCSD also argues that DOE’s approval failed to protect the public’s access
and use of the 66’ public reserve on the beach surrounding the
development, and that the development violates zoning for the area under
the Mango Creek/Placencia Special Development Area, as recognized by
Belize law.
A court date has been set for 20 April 2007 for judicial consideration of
PCSD’s claim.
Donations to the Ara Macao litigation fund may be made by depositing funds
into the PCSD account at Atlantic Bank, account number 100158838.
Donations may also be made by check
made payable to the Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development,
General Delivery, Placencia, Belize.
Money may also be wire transferred to
PCSD, using the following wiring instructions:
Bank of New York
36-63 Main Street
New York, New York 11354
ABA#: 021000018
For credit to Atlantic Bank
Swift Code: IRVTUS3N
Atlantic Bank Account No: 8900545925
For further credit to
Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development, Atlantic Bank Account no.
100158838
Please note that if wiring from the US,
this is NOT an international wire. The funds are wired to Bank of
New York which, in turn, transfers them to PCSD in Placencia.
The Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable
Development is a Belize non-profit corporation and grass roots community
organization of Placencia Peninsula residents concerned with the rapid,
and often poorly planned and executed, development of the Peninsula. PCSD
seeks to bring information about proposed developments to Peninsula
residents to ensure that all developments are environmentally sustainable
with respect to the fragile eco-systems of the Peninsula and its
communities and cultures.
Please contact PCSD at 610-4718 or
info@placenciadocuments.info for further information.
- Environmental
Compliance Plan
-
Public Consultation, 3 May 2006
- Statements from
Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development
- Letters and
Reports
-
Community Responses
-
Site Plan and Fact
Sheet
-
Ara Macao Documents
- Media Releases
-
PCSD Minutes
|
- Independent EIA
Analyses
-
Addendum Comments by Dr. Tom Williams
-
Williams Summary and Recommendations
-
Addendum Comments by E-Law
-
EIA Comments
by Dr. Melanie McField,
Healthy Reefs for Healthy People
Initiative, Smithsonian Institution
-
Additional Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao, June 2006, by Dr.
Mark Chernaik and Mercedes, Lu, QF
-
Additional Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao, June 2006, by Dr.
Thomas Williams
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort, May 2006, by Dr. Mark Chernaik
and Mercedes Lu, Q.F
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort, May 2006, by Dr. Thomas Williams
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort by Todd Barber,
Chairman, Reef Ball Foundation, May 2006
-
Statement of Tom Opishinski on BESST waste
water treatment analysis
-
Preliminary Comments on Ara Macao EIA
- EIA Documents
- DOE Correspondence
|
.jpg)
Public Consultation, 3 May 2006, Ara Macao Resort, Placencia Belize:
A public hearing on the proposed Ara Macao Resort & Marina (a/k/a
Scarlet Macaw Resort and Marina) was held in Seine Bight Village on 3 May
2006 by the Belize Department of the Environment.
The
hope-to-be Ara Macao (Scarlet Macaw) Resort developer, ioVest Development,
LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, and its consultants seemed taken aback by the
crowd of almost 300 local residents who filled the parking lot of
the Seine Bight primary school.
At least that's the way it seemed when concerned
residents found the developer and its
consultants
huddled in a very tiny pre-school classroom where 30 very tiny pre-school
chairs had been solicitously placed by the developer.
(Or perhaps the developer and its consultants were well
aware of the number of local residents who were concerned about the
effects of the proposed Ara Macao Resort and Marina and selected the classroom as a way to prevent
full public participation in the hearing. But, no, that couldn't be
. . . )
Residents
became frustrated when the developers refused to move outside so that
everyone could participate in the meeting.
Fortunately, representatives of the Belize Department
of the Environment finally arrived (almost an hour late) and persuaded the
developers (with consultants in tow) to address Placencia Peninsula and
Independence Village residents outside the school.

Concerns expressed by Peninsula residents at the
meeting included:
-
Beach erosion and sand starvation of properties south
of the proposed development.
-
Solid waste disposal
-
Realignment of existing Placencia road into
environmentally sensitive wetlands
-
Waste water and sanitary waste disposal
-
The proposed construction of two 9-hole golf courses
and run-off of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides into the
Placencia Lagoon
-
Destruction of lobster, conch and fish habitats
-
Effects of sedimentation from the dredging of the
marina (1.2million cubic yards) and land reclamation on local coral beds,
fish, lobster and conch habitats and marine organisms
-
Impact on local cultures, local infrastructure and
local resources (the 12 mile long Placencia Peninsula has one doctor,
one nurse and 4 police officers to serve the entire area, schools are
over-crowded and the area has no fire protection)
-
Hurricane evacuation for residents south of the
proposed Ara Macao Resort development
-
Lack of available housing for new residents brought
into the area by the development
-
Disdain by the developers and consultants for the
opinions of local residents
-
Actual ownership of the property on which the
proposed Ara Macao Resort development would be located
Placencia residents requested the developer and the
Department of the Environment to hold additional meetings so that all
questions could be addressed. That request was met with silence.
Report from Observers:
Account No. 1: How I wish
you could have been there to see how the multitude of people from the
entire Peninsula were treated by our government
and the developers. They changed the venue from the larger church to a
tiny classroom with chairs fit for 6 and 7 year olds. The DOE people did
not even arrive for the 6:30 meeting until 7:15. It was finally agreed to
hold the meeting outside with all standing...a good idea as perhaps 20
of the large number could have squeezed into the room. Then Mrs. Fox,
acting as spokesperson, politely greeted them and
asked if we could please begin with questions to the department and
developers as we had been studying the EIA and had already had meetings in
relation to it. This was not even acknowledged. They began a long drawn
out explanation of what an EIA is, how it is conducted and then a full
discussion of the developers plan. I unfortunately had to leave, but I
am sure you will get a full report on this insulting and demeaning
treatment of the citizens of this peninsula.
Account No. 2: The organizers met early 5;30 pm
at the beautiful new St. Alphonsus Church on the beach in Seine Bight.
A fresh breeze blew into the church and the few women & children there
started to arrange pews, PA system, poster of acronyms, environmental
posters, etc. A petition opposing the Ara Macao project was going around.
Suddenly the Chairman of Seine Bight arrived and told us all to move to
the school, that is where Dept of Environment had set up. We packed
everything up, loaded up the vehicles, some went on foot through the
center of the Village. the signs on the road were moved, SB residents told
people where to turn to the school. Vehicles from Placencia & Maya Beach
were coming in now and people were getting confused, and angry, suspicious
that the meeting was being sabotaged..
The DOE was not at the school, but the Ara Macao developers were.
People waited patiently for a while, and then began to get impatient. Some
signs came out: "Get up, Stand up for your rights", "No Jobs for us", "No
locals allowed inside" & others. We discovered that the developers had set
up the kindergarten classroom with tiny baby chairs for us, the space
could only hold about 12 adults; there were by now 200 people outside in
the dusty parking lot, demanding a meeting. It was about 7:15 pm, meeting
was scheduled for 6:30 pm. We decided to bring out a few of the baby
chairs for some of our older folks and those with crutches & canes. We
encouraged people not to leave, to stay for the meeting.
We were told the DOE was about 10 miles north at that time. We were
getting angrier and dustier, most of us thinking the worst--the DOE went
to the church which was deserted and left! I was holding a sign; a man
(one of the developer's consultants) asked if I had a license to picket --
I was not picketing, I was practicing my right to free speech, protected
by the Belize Constitution. I suddenly became angry--he was trying to
intimidate me! I decided to raise my voice & let it be known--we have a
right to speak, to be informed, to have our questions answered. That is in
the Belize Constitution.
By then people were milling around & banging on the classroom wall that
was set for the meeting--a few people were in there, the developers, maybe
someone representing DOE or Coastal Zone. We demanded they come out & have
the meeting. DOE had gotten there by that time and one of their guys came
out tried to get us all to go back to the church, everyone refused, though
a few towards the back did trickle over that way.
One of the speakers for DOE refused to begin the meeting until Police
showed up. There were 300 angry people by then, from all over the area,
Riversdale, Maya Beach, Seine Bight, Placencia, Independence, Dangriga.
Maybe they were feeling intimidated. They shouldn't have gotten the crowd
angry by moving them around for an hour.
DOE made their presentation, the marina developer made his presentation,
the golf course builder made his presentation, the solid waste disposal
guy made his presentation. The crowd listened politely for about 30
minutes then grew impatient--we all wanted wanted to ask some questions.
Finally, our turn. Everyone spoke, made comments & asked questions,
one by one into the microphone. Friends of Nature, Mr. Hulse, Area
Representative Mr Ferguson (not received well, was booed, was asked "how
much did you get?"), concerned citizens, doctors, IHS students, taxi
drivers, local restaurant owners, clerks, grocers, shop owners, artists,
musicians, hotel owners, many BTIA members, fishermen, Garifuna Council
members, Placencia chairman, Independence chairman. Seine Bight chairman
was not to be seen.
Everyone already knew about erosion from the big sand collecting walls
(steal our beach), environmental damage to lagoon from golf course (kill
the manatee), damage to reef & siltation resulting from dredging & "big
boat activity" (cruise ship question was left unanswered).
The main questions were about environmental damage.
These questions were glibly answered that their retaining wall stones
would replace any lost reef for lobster homes, and the extra sand
collected would be moved south by trucks so we could have some too; they
would use siltation curtains. All of us knew those methods do not work,
but it's a good thing many of us did our homework & could show scientific
evidence for that. There really was no such thing as an environmentally
friendly golf course for that sensitive jungle/ mangrove area by the
lagoon.
I wanted to know --why no locals allowed? It's all over their EIA:
casino--" local use discouraged", swimming pool, "local use discouraged",
beach "private", and so on. They denied it, but someone from one of the
local hardware stores came to my rescue with the EIA, and we made him, an
"investor," read those very words, He kept saying "why would we do
that"--I replied, "I don't know, because everyone is welcome to my resort,
even you!"
We went on this way until after 10 pm. by then all were exhausted and we
were promised another meeting in the near future. I have never seen so
many angry people at 1 time on the peninsula in my 15 years here!
It was wonderful for the whole community to come together & support our
fragile environment, fight for it. This is an eco tourism destination, not
a cruise ship destination. We deserved to be heard. We were fed up these
types of non informational situations arising that would affect our
communities & lives, we were never informed, never consulted, until ads
for Ara Macao plots were showing up in Belize. Why? We want information
that could affect our lives, we deserve it and all of Belize deserves
better protection from exploitation than that.
We would like the Department of Environment to protect our environment.
Apparently they have been selling rights to mangrove clearing left & right
without assessing the situation here. There is a limit how much this
ecologically delicate peninsula can take. I believe it is time to come to
the legal end of mangrove clearing on the peninsula.
Status of Review Process for Ara Macao Resort and Marina, Placencia
Belize According to the Belize Department of the
Environment, ("DOE") no approvals have been granted to ioVest Development
LLC to develop a resort. Final approval or disapproval is determined
by the Belize government after receiving the recommendations of the
National Environmental Advisory Committee ("NEAC").
NEAC required the public consultation on 3 May 2006
before considering the application of ioVest because of public outcries
over the lack of information made available to Placencia Peninsula
communities about the proposed development.
The deadline for the official comment period after the
3 May public hearing was officially extended to 27 May 2006, and was again
extended to 9 June 2006 to allow the developer to submit official
information requested by NEAC.
That deadline has come and gone, and as of 12 June
2006, the additional information has not been submitted by the developer,
nor has the deadline again been extended.
PCSD has
formally requested
that we receive a print and digital copy of the additional information if
and when it is received so that we can make it available to Peninsula
residents and on this site. As yet, DOE has not responded in
writing.
However, at a meeting on Saturday, 24 June 2006, with
the Honorable John Briceno, Minister of Natural Resources, the Environment
and Industry, and other government representatives, the Minister stated
that the additional information requested from the developer would be made
publicly available both in print and via the Internet.
Minister Briceno also indicated that more than two (2)
weeks would be allowed for public review and comment (as was the case with
the original EIA and Appendix, totaling 577 pages).
All government representatives at the meeting,
including Minister Briceno, gave their word that a decision has not yet
been made on the approval or denial of the proposed Ara Macao Resort and
Marina.
21 July 2006
The Addendum to the Ara Macao EIA was made available to
the public from the Website of the Department of Natural Resources
on Friday, 7 July 2006. However, a hard copy of the Addendum was not
made available until Wednesday, 12 July 2006. And, the only
hard copy of the Addendum available for the Peninsula was deposited with
the Seine Bight Water Board.
The National Environmental Appraisal Committee (NEAC)
will meet to discuss the Addendum on Wednesday, 26 July 2006.
Following are links to Addendum Information:
.JPG)




.jpg)

All photographs courtesy of Juan Caducio of Placencia
Village.
|