|
Ara Macao
Correspondence
UPDATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
27 June 2007: A phone call
was received today from an independent contractor employed by Ara Macao
asking (demanding?) that the historical information on this Website about
Ara Macao be taken down because it is "misleading and inflammatory."
I have reviewed the information presented here, and all of it reports
events as they occurred during the Ara Macao EIA approval process.
This entire process was a very significant one for the Placencia Peninsula
and surrounding areas. It occupied public debate for over an entire
year, it brought Peninsula communities and people together, and ultimately
has made everyone on the Peninsula much more aware of environmental and
development issues. It also raised issues that continue to need to
be answered, such as the capacity and recharge rate of the aquifer that
provides water to the people of the Peninsula. For these reasons
alone, the information provided here is important for the Peninsula,
historically, environmentally, sociologically and economically.
1 June 2007: Justice Awich
of the Belize Supreme Court denied PCSD's application to proceed with
judicial review of the approval of Ara Macao by the Belize Department of
the Environment. Justice Awich also assessed legal costs against
PCSD. PCSD did not have the funds to appeal Justice Awich's ruling,
although PCSD does believe that Justice Awich's ruling was in error.
A copy of the judicial decision will be made available when a
digital copy can be obtained.
2 April 2007: On Monday, 2
April 2007, the Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development (PCSD)
filed a lawsuit asking the Belize Supreme Court to overturn the decision
of the Belize Department of the Environment (DOE) approving the Ara Macao
Resort and Marina development at the northern end of the Placencia
Peninsula. PCSD also asked the court to grant an injunction to prevent Ara
Macao Development Ltd. from proceeding with the development.
PCSD’s suit is based, in part, on DOE’s failure to comply with Belize’s
environmental regulations.
PCSD also maintains that DOE unreasonably and irrationally approved the
development because it did not have critical information about
environmental issues such as downstream beach erosion, effect of the
development on the Peninsula’s marine environment (such as lobster, conch
and coral reefs), and whether Ara Macao and other new developments could
quickly use up the water supply that provides Placencia, Seine Bight, Maya
Beach, Independence and Big Creek with drinking water.
PCSD also argues that DOE’s approval failed to protect the public’s access
and use of the 66’ public reserve on the beach surrounding the
development, and that the development violates zoning for the area under
the Mango Creek/Placencia Special Development Area, as recognized by
Belize law.
A court date has been set for 20 April 2007 for judicial consideration of
PCSD’s claim.
Donations to the Ara Macao litigation fund may be made by depositing funds
into the PCSD account at Atlantic Bank, account number 100158838.
Donations may also be made by check
made payable to the Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development,
General Delivery, Placencia, Belize.
Money may also be wire transferred to
PCSD, using the following wiring instructions:
Bank of New York
36-63 Main Street
New York, New York 11354
ABA#: 021000018
For credit to Atlantic Bank
Swift Code: IRVTUS3N
Atlantic Bank Account No: 8900545925
For further credit to
Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development, Atlantic Bank Account no.
100158838
Please note that if wiring from the US,
this is NOT an international wire. The funds are wired to Bank of
New York which, in turn, transfers them to PCSD in Placencia.
The Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable
Development is a Belize non-profit corporation and grass roots community
organization of Placencia Peninsula residents concerned with the rapid,
and often poorly planned and executed, development of the Peninsula. PCSD
seeks to bring information about proposed developments to Peninsula
residents to ensure that all developments are environmentally sustainable
with respect to the fragile eco-systems of the Peninsula and its
communities and cultures.
Please contact PCSD at 610-4718 or
info@placenciadocuments.info for further information.
- Environmental
Compliance Plan
-
Public Consultation, 3 May 2006
- Statements from
Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development
- Letters and
Reports
-
Community Responses
-
Site Plan and Fact
Sheet
-
Ara Macao Documents
- Media Releases
-
PCSD MInutes
|
- Independent EIA
Analyses
-
Addendum Comments by Dr. Tom Williams
-
Williams Summary and Recommendations
-
Addendum Comments by E-Law
-
EIA Comments
by Dr. Melanie McField,
Healthy Reefs for Healthy People
Initiative, Smithsonian Institution
-
Additional Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao, June 2006, by Dr.
Mark Chernaik and Mercedes, Lu, QF
-
Additional Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao, June 2006, by Dr.
Thomas Williams
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort, May 2006, by Dr. Mark Chernaik
and Mercedes Lu, Q.F
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort, May 2006, by Dr. Thomas Williams
-
Environmental Analysis of Ara Macao Resort by Todd Barber,
Chairman, Reef Ball Foundation, May 2006
-
Statement of Tom Opishinski on BESST waste
water treatment analysis
-
Preliminary Comments on Ara Macao EIA
- EIA Documents
- DOE Correspondence
|
Peninsula
Citizens for
Sustainable Development
General Delivery,
Placencia, Belize
±
610-4718
±
info@placenciadocuments.info
From:
info@placenciadocuments.info
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:48 PM
To: 'department of environment'
Subject: Ara Macao EIA Addendum
I have now been able to download from the MNREI site (with considerable
difficulty) the Ara Macao Addendum to the Ara Macao EIA. This document, in
uncompressed format, is now available at www.placenciadocuments.info/scarletmacaw/addendum.pdf.
(Managing to download the document took an entire day due to the errors in
uploading by someone at DOE or MNREI that resulted in the document's many
compressed parts (22) not being able to be compiled without manual
manipulation.)
Again, we would like to know why the only EIA review document that was
posted on the government's endorsed site was the Reef Ball review and not
the reviews of Dr. Tom Williams, Dr. Melanie McField and Dr. Chernaik that
have been previously forwarded to DOE, the digital formats of which are
available at:
Williams Comments:
McField Comments:
http://www.placenciadocuments.info/scarletmacaw/statements/mcfield_comments.doc
Chernaik Comments:
We would also like to know how the selective decision was
made to post only the Reef Ball EIA review and not the reviews of Drs.
Williams, McField and Chernaik? The posting of only one review could be
viewed as an attempt to keep relevant information from the public.
Also, why are DOE documents posted with an .rar file compression format
that can't be opened without purchasing a special program? Why not simply
upload the entire document or use a more common compression utility that
doesn't require the purchase of a special program (such as .zip)?
We realize that the documents take up more space on your server if
uncompressed. However, if the purpose really is easy public access, then
the documents should be posted in a format that can be readily downloaded
by anyone, without incurring an expense to purchase a special program.
(The site on which I have posted these documents uncompressed, e.g, in a
format that may be downloaded by anyone, costs less than BZ$100 for an
entire year. Surely the Government of Belize can afford BZ$100 in a
12-month period, perhaps even twice that much, to make its actions open
and accountable to the public.)
We look forward to your response.
14 June 2006
Mr. Jorge Franco
Department of the Environment
10/12 Ambergris Drive
Belmopan, Belize
Re: Proposed Ara Macao Development
Dear Mr. Franco:
PCSD understands that the addendum to the Ara Macao EIA requested by the
National Environmental Appraisal Committee has not yet been delivered to
DOE by the Ara Macao developer.
Neither PCS nor the general public were informed that an addendum had been
required, or that the purpose of extending the deadline for comments to 9
June 2006 was to allow comments on the addendum.
Therefore, PCSD formally requests at least one copy of the Addendum in
both print and CD format so that we can make it as widely available for
review and comment as possible. We also formally request a reasonable time
for review of the Addendum. We believe that a reasonable time for review
and comment should be longer than two (2) weeks given the complexity of
the issues involved with the proposed Ara Macao development.
Also, since the Addendum has not been delivered by the deadline date of 9
June 2006, what is the current status of the EIA? Is there a final cut-off
date for the submission of the Addendum to DOE?
We look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Placencia Citizens for Sustainable Development
By:____________________________________
Mary V. Toy
cc: BACONGO
Friends of Nature
Independence
Village Council
Placencia Village
Council
Placencia BTIA
Placencia Village
Water Board
Seine Bight
Village Council
Seine Bight
Village Water Board
TASTE
This refers to your correspondence dated May
16, 2006 with respect to Ara Macao Development.
Kindly be informed that several persons have
contacted the Department of the Environment
requesting contact information
of the Developer and/or
EIA preparer and we have kindly done so.
Should anyone have any comments or concerns,
questions they would like to ask the Department, kindly have them
contact the Department.
Kindly be informed that the the deadline for
the submission of comments will be published in one of most widely
circulated newspaper.
Thanks for ensuring that Belize's
development is environmentally sound.
Jorge Franco
Department of the Environment
Phone: 822-2816 or 2542
Fax: 822-2862
Peninsula
Citizens for
Sustainable Development
General Delivery,
Placencia, Belize
±
610-4718
±
info@placenciadocuments.info
16
May 2006
Mr. Franco
Department of the Environment
10/12 Ambergris Drive
Belmopan, Belize
Re: Proposed
Ara Macao Development
Dear Mr. Franco:
We still have not received
any information regarding any of the following issues:
-
Dates of additional
public consultations on Ara Macao
-
Date
of next NEAC meeting when the proposed Ara Macao project will be
discussed
-
Answers from the developer regarding questions asked by the public at
the 3 May consultation
-
Extension of deadline for public comments
We
understand that some individuals have oral information from DOE that the
deadline has been extended to 23 May 2006. However, no formal
notification has been given of the deadline extension.
In
addition, we understand that someone in your office has been directing
individuals contacting DOE about the development to the developer’s
consultants.
The
laws of Belize require comments to be sent to the Department of the
Environment. The developer’s consultant owes a duty of loyalty to his
client, the developer, not to the people of Belize.
Therefore, it is inappropriate for members of the public to be directed to
discuss the development with a consultant employed by the developer.
Thank
you very much for your assistance, and we look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Placencia
Citizens for Sustainable Development
cc: BACONGO Friends of
Nature Independence Village Council
Placencia Village Council Placencia
BTIA Placencia Village Water Board
Seine Bight Village Council Seine
Bight Village Water Board
In regards to your email of May 7, 2006 with
respect to the above captioned subject, kindly be informed that a
decision for another meeting will have to be determined by the National
Environmental Appraisal Committee (NEAC) as per the EIA Regulations.
In regards to the deadline for submission of
comments, a date has not been finalized. Notwithstanding, I shall
inform you of the deadline for submission of comments in advance of the
next meeting of the NEAC.
Thanks for your concerns and rest assure
that all meaningful input will be taken into consideration during the
reveiw process.
Best regards,
Jorge Franco
Department of the Environment
Peninsula
Citizens for
Sustainable Development
General Delivery,
Placencia, Belize
±
610-4718
±
info@placenciadocuments.info
5 May
2006
Mr. Franco
Department of the Environment
10/12 Ambergris Drive
Belmopan, Belize
Re: Proposed
Ara Macao Development
Dear Mr. Franco:
We would like to thank you
and Mr. Allegria for coordinating Wednesday night’s public consultation on
the proposed Ara Macao development.
Residents of communities on
the Peninsula and in Independence Village felt that the meeting was very
useful and would welcome additional meetings so that they can receive more
information about the proposed development.
Also, you stated at the
meeting that the deadline for submission of comments would be extended
past the current deadline date of 9 May 2006.
Could you please advise us
of:
·
When another public meeting can be held (hopefully in a
location that can accommodate more people), and
·
The new deadline for submission of comments about the
proposed development.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Peninsula Citizens for Sustainable Development
cc: BACONGO
Friends of Nature
Placencia Village
Council Placencia BTIA
Seine Bight Village
Council Seine Bight Village Water Board
Independence Village Council
Placencia Village Water Board
Dear Mary,
I take this opportunity to applaud your
interest in the project and to assit the Department in sparking the
public interests in this development. The Department looks forward to
the input of the general public and takes this opportunity to inform you
that whilst the Public Notice has a deadline of March 30, all comments
can still be sent directly to the Department and we shall ensure that
each and everyone is taken into consideration when reviewing the EIA.
In addition, kindly be informed that the
Department is working on its website and shall soon be posting most, if
not all EIAs online to ensure greater public input.
Yours truely,
Jorge Franco
From:
envirodept [ mailto:envirodept@btl.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:31 PM
To:
info@destinationsbelize.com
Subject: Re: Scarlet Macaw EIA (RESENDING) (RESENDING)
HI Mary,
We have have just recently informed the developers of this proposal
that an EIA report will be necessary. The Terms of Reference for this
EIA was finalized this week.
The development of the EIA report and the timing thereof is the
developer's responsibility. As soon as it is presented to us we will be
distributing for public review.
Thansk for your interest.
Martin Alegria
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mary" <info@destinationsbelize.com>
To: <envirodept@btl.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: FW: Scarlet Macaw EIA (RESENDING) (RESENDING)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary [ mailto:info@destinationsbelize.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: 'envirodept@btl.net'
> Subject: FW: Scarlet Macaw EIA (RESENDING)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary [ mailto:info@destinationsbelize.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:56 AM
> To: 'envirodept@btl.net'
> Subject: Scarlet Macaw EIA
> I would like to know the status of the EIA for the Scarlet Macaw
development.
> Thank you.
|